8 Problems Compliance Teams Face with Existing GRC Platforms
GRC platform(s) offer many wide-ranging and worthwhile benefits. But many companies quickly encounter the limits of the native evidence collection automation capabilities of their GRC platform.
Limited Integration with Proprietary and On-Premises Systems
Many GRC platforms don’t support proprietary, on-premises, or hybrid systems.
Scaling Issues with Automation
Existing GRC platforms struggle to scale with large enterprises, especially when managing multiple frameworks or control owners.
Black-Box Automations
GRC platforms often have rigid, black-box automations that can’t be customized or adapted to unique company needs.
Lack of Flexibility for Regulatory Updates
GRC platforms struggle to keep up with rapid regulatory changes, leaving companies scrambling.
Incomplete Coverage
for Complex Infrastructure
Existing automation tools can’t handle non-standard infrastructures or proprietary setups.
Lack of Cross-Platform Standardization
Companies using multiple GRC tools face inconsistent processes and workflows, making compliance more difficult to manage.
Time-Consuming Remediation Processes
Evidence remediation tasks aren’t fully automated, leaving teams with manual work that slows them down.
Siloed Collaboration Across Teams
Existing GRC platforms don’t facilitate smooth cross-department collaboration, leaving gaps between security, IT, and compliance.
ComplianceCow – One Evidence Automation Studio Across Multiple GRC Platforms
For businesses with multiple GRC platforms, ComplianceCow’s automation studio standardizes and elevates their capabilities, bringing all platforms to a higher, consistent level of automation.